* Implement `add`, with tests.
* Implement `add_i`.
There's no test, because for whatever reason, I can't figure out how to emit this from Animate CC 2020.
* avm2: Implement `bitand` with tests.
* Implement `bitnot` with tests.
* Implement `bitor` with tests.
* avm2: Implement `bitxor`
* avm2: Implement `declocal`, `declocal_i`, `decrement`, and `decrement_i`.
* tests: `swf_approx` tests should be allowed to print NaNs.
* avm2: Implement `divide`.
* avm2: Implement `inclocal`, `inclocal_i`, `increment`, and `increment_i`.
* avm2: Implement `lshift`.
* Implement `modulo`.
* avm2: Implement `multiply` and `multiply_i` (no tests for the latter)
* avm2: Implement `negate` and `negate_i` (no tests for the latter)
* avm2: Implement `rshift`
* avm2: Implement `subtract` and `subtract_i` (the latter without tests)
* avm2: Implement `urshift`.
Note that this does NOT completely test the full range of if instructions for abstract relational comparison. Notably, the Adobe Animate CC compiler compiles each operator into it's negated equivalent, e.g. `<` becomes `ifnlt`.
I do not know how to get it to emit `ifge` or the like, which differ only by how they handle `NaN`s.
The test is also far more in-depth than the `if_eq`/`if_ne` tests, which use the same set of vectors as the strict-equality tests from a while ago. Interestingly, this test passed on first run
The ECMA-262 documentation is awfully overwrought for something that boils down to "chop off the non-whole part, wrap to 32 bits, then reinterpret as signed". Bitwise operations are *hell* to describe mathematically, and such descriptions are even harder to understand.
As compiled by Adobe Animate CC 2020, this test appears to only use `iffalse`. However, both `op_is_false` and `op_is_true` coerce in the same manner, so I'm not entirely sure this is a problem for now.
This function has vague documentation about enabling locale-specific formatting in subclasses. As far as I can tell, none of the objects I implemented so far do anything different than `toString`, so I just have it use the same `TObject` property I set up for `toString`.
This was originally something *way* more evil: mixed inheritance between ES3 and ES4 classes. It didn't pan out due to fundamental limitations of the two object models. How the hell did Brendan Eich/Adobe/TC-39 expect ES4 classes to be adopted in already-existing codebases?!
This tests:
* Getter invocation
* Setter invocation
* Properties with one or the other, but not both
* Inheritance
* Superproperty getters and setters
* Getters with inherited setter
* Setters with inherited getter
David Wendt